Posts Tagged ‘newspapers’

More Newspapers!

February 1, 2017

Yesterday I subscribed (digitally) to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post. I already subscribe to the Santa Rosa Press Democrat (my excellent local paper) and The New York Times, and I really don’t need more reading opportunities. However, as I think about strategic action in these troubled times, I keep coming back to investigative reporting. We need reporters who dig deep and present facts about complicated matters. (We have plenty of opinions already.) Sorry, TV and the internet don’t do that. Newspapers do. And they need money!

I look on these added subscriptions just like my annual contributions to the Yosemite Conservancy and my local public radio stations and Amnesty International. They are for the public good.

Advertisements

What To Do  

December 16, 2016

A lot of us are alarmed about the state of America, and many are asking what they can do. Here’s my answer: subscribe to a newspaper.

There are so many issues that require good reporting. Just to name a few, we have questions about whether the FBI or the CIA has been politicized, questions about whether, how and why Russia tried to influence our election, questions about the future of healthcare. None of these can be answered by pontificating partisans on TV, let alone by Twitter. They need careful, thoughtful, diligent reporting.

A bigger question is whether America has become a post-truth society, with citizens who think the world is just a big reality TV show. At the least, we are drifting that way. Countering these tendencies requires citizens who read careful, thoughtful, diligent reporting, and don’t get their information from TV talking heads and tweets.

Good reporting and reliable sources of information start with newspapers. Nothing so far has surfaced to replace them. Yet newspapers are economically imperiled, and their readership has dropped. Therefore, a very practical contribution to these difficult times is to subscribe. That way, the newspapers get your money to pay their reporters; and you get better access to information.

Google and the Future of Journalism

May 26, 2010

For anybody who cares about the future of magazines and newspapers, James Fallows’ cover story in the latest Atlantic (http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/06/how-to-save-the-news/8095) is a must read.

Fallows has spent a lot of time at Google, and he’s passing on how they view the situation. Interestingly, Google has been involved with helping many news outlets as they struggle through trying times. And surprisingly, Google is quite optimistic.

Google is looking at the long term, which is quite different from the view trying to meet payroll. Fallows reports a profound lack of interest in the question that fascinates news people—whether anybody will pay for news on the internet.  “Of course people will end up paying in some form—why even talk about it? The important questions involved the details of how they would pay, and for what kind of news.” According to Google’s Neal Mohan, “The audience is there, and the dollars will follow. I would argue that publishers will ultimately do better in the digital world.”

That’s because delivering news over the internet is so much more efficient—no paper, printing presses or delivery trucks—and because the internet offers greater flexibility in the kind of news stories you present.

“One Google employee… mentioned [a] report on journalism’s future and pointed out a section called ‘Focus on the User.’ ‘They just mean, “Get money out of the user,”’ he said. ‘Nowhere do they talk about how to create something people actually want to read and engage with and use.’”

In the long run, bloggers and videographers and a million young entrepreneurs will figure out how to present more compelling content, with more varied approaches that target the interests of individual consumers. Google people spoke of the herd instinct that rules in many news outlets. This may sometimes increase the buzz around an otherwise disinteresting story—if everybody is writing about Michael Jackson, they may even get me to read a story about him. More likely, though, herd journalism represses readership. The more variety, the more likely I am to find something I care about.

In the short run, newspapers and magazines are going through a terrifically difficult transition. Readership is down. Reporters and photographers get laid off because advertising has vanished. There’s nobody left to cover the city council meeting, or the insurance committee of the state Senate.

According to Google CEO Eric Schmidt, “Newspapers don’t have a demand problem; they have a business-model problem.” Newspapers and magazines are in the throat of an erupting volcano, moving from print to internet, from a “bundled” approach that joins news, sports, movie reviews, and Ann Landers, all paid for from a single budget, to some yet unknown way of linking stories and payment.

Fallows details a number of ways Google is trying to help newspapers through this transition. Why? Because Google needs a strong journalism sector. “Google is valuable, by the logic I repeatedly heard, because the information people find through it is valuable. If the information is uninteresting, inaccurate, or untimely, people will not want to search for it.”

It’s encouraging to read this, because the more usual attitude of web-oriented folk is to dance gleefully on the grave of the “old media.” This article doesn’t shed much light on the next five years. But Google’s optimism, and their faith in innovation, inspires hope. If they think journalism has a future, maybe it does.