What Matters Most—Part 5 on Sexuality

From a purely empirical point of view, marriage matters tremendously. Children who are raised by two biological parents do dramatically better, on average, than children who get the advantage of only one biological parent. Yes, it’s possible that a high-conflict marriage or an abusive marriage is worse than divorce for children (though statistically I don’t think that’s proven), and yes, it’s possible that divorcing parents who act nicely to each other may greatly reduce the injuries their children suffer (though I don’t think you can demonstrate that statistically either). And yes, I know that some marriages are so hopeless that permanent separation or divorce is the only real possibility. All the same, let’s not kid ourselves. Marriages that last are far better, on average, than any other environment for children.

But then, who needs convincing? Certainly not the people who line up to get married in elaborate ceremonies every summer. They want their marriages to last. In fact, most of them have a hard time imagining how they wouldn’t.

Heck, even single parents—the 17-year-old mothers who dropped out of high school to have their baby, the 25-year-old father of three kids by three different women—they too think fondly of marriage that lasts. It didn’t happen to work out in their case, but they aren’t quite done hoping that it might yet.

Everybody wants good marriages, but these days nobody knows how to make them. This is the major reason the devastating statistics about the impact of marriage and divorce on kids aren’t widely known. What’s the point of disseminating bad news if you don’t know what to do about it?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think nobody knows how to stop the wild acceleration of divorce, cohabitation and single parenting in America. Don’t look to Planned Parenthood for help. And don’t look to churches, either, since for all their emphasis on lasting marriages, their performance level is only marginally higher than the rest of society.

Too many factors work against marriage:

-the eroticization of everything

-the idolization of individual choice, individual pleasure and individual destiny

-the rise of co-ed everything, and the increased possibility of unfettered privacy for unmarried couples

-the normalization of premarital sex

-the normalization of cohabitation

-the normalization of divorce

American society places a premium on individual satisfaction, while broadcasting a view of life that puts sex at the apex. With easy opportunity for sex, and no societal barriers to either sex or cohabitation between willing adolescents or adults, normalcy has been redefined to mean a variety of sexual relationships with marriage as a possible addition—a capstone to the best of relationships.

If you don’t find the best of relationships, you can have plenty of sex anyway. And if the best of relationships at some point stops being the best of relationships, you can drop the marriage. It always was optional.

Some heroic individuals will resist that—today’s New York Times has an article about Florida quarterback Tim Tebow and his plan to wait until marriage to have sex—but they are quite unusual. And truthfully, marriage is difficult. Relationships are difficult. They always have been. Most things that matter are. Without much societal support, don’t expect a dramatic change in the failure rate.

So what do we do?

We keep fighting. The value of marriage is too great to give up.

The fight goes on at two levels. One is to help marriages through their difficulties. Beginning with premarital counseling, and going on through classes and literature and mentoring and personal counseling, we do everything we can to help couples make strong marriages, and keep them strong.

Another level is through teaching. Two things matter, and we have to keep telling people that they matter.

Young people, rather naturally, will not agree with their elders on all kinds of lifestyle questions. They will want to listen to and sing different music, they will dabble in different religious pathways and will experiment with drugs and alcohol.  They will entertain new ideas that horrify their parents. They will tattoo their bodies and wear clothes intended to shock. They will use terrible language. They will gamble. They will smoke cigars. All of these matter, but they can be undone.

Marriage cannot be undone. It is too serious to “get over.” That is among the implications of Jesus’ words in Matthew 19: 1-12.

Sex cannot be undone, either. This is the point Paul tried to get across to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 6:12-20). When two people have sex there is an exchange that affects both persons’ core. There is simply no room for experimentation, in Paul’s view. Sex is never casual.

One might add that children cannot be undone.  Marriage leads to children. Sex leads to children. The consequences for those children of marriages that do not last, or sex that is uncommitted, are absolutely immense.

It’s not just for children’s sake that we say these things, however. In fact, it’s notable that the Scriptures hardly mention children in these matters. The things themselves—marriage and sex—have overwhelming and irreversible impact on the people involved.

There is a better way, We live in a society that works powerfully against that way, and no group, no individual, is immune from society’s impact. But then, no group and no individual is immune from the next pandemic. We still do our best to fight the plague.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “What Matters Most—Part 5 on Sexuality”

  1. jun Says:

    Touche! And given our powerful sex urge in a society (mine is no different from the US) that celebrates (I can’t find a better word) its gratification, what chance have we against this pandemic? I guess, we need to pray for and work for another set of eyes and ears, which can only come from a love of God that’s encompassing and revealing of who we truly are and what we really are meant to be. May your word find hearing in the ears of men (and women). Thanks.

  2. Mark Medin Says:

    I am facinated by – and really should be more troubled by – the fact that the obscenity of choice which is meant to have the most impact and shock value is the four-letter word (and its variations) for sexual intercourse. And yet, I am sure that no one who uses it does so conscious of its root meaning; it has taken on its own identity, mostly from the mere sound of the word. It is a microcosm of the deep disconnect in our human identity. It is reflected in your observation that we have eroticized everything. The net effect has not been to enhance our sexual awareness and experience, but just the opposite; it has been absorbed into the total consumer consciousness of our society. And I am a victim of that, and struggle to let it be overcome by the work of the Spirit.

  3. Debbie Says:

    Altering no-fault divorce laws would go a long way toward slowing down the rate of divorce. I found myself on the unwanted receiving end of a divorce from my “Christian” husband of 20 years. With no fault, I had no choice – it was a done deal and my children and I were just along for the ride. I am a lawyer, too, so the no-fault process stung even more. I understand the underpinnings of no-fault, but it has evolved to the point of ridiculousness. At the very least, marriages involving children should not be subject to the whims of one spouse. The emotional and spiritual carnage left by my former husband with the help of the no-fault divorce laws are healing by God’s grace, but the scars will remain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: