<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Something Fresh on Genesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timstafford.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/something-fresh-on-genesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timstafford.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/something-fresh-on-genesis/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:49:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Graham</title>
		<link>http://timstafford.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/something-fresh-on-genesis/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Graham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timstafford.wordpress.com/?p=960#comment-1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe John Walton should collaborate with Simon Conway Morris on a book?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe John Walton should collaborate with Simon Conway Morris on a book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael P.</title>
		<link>http://timstafford.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/something-fresh-on-genesis/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timstafford.wordpress.com/?p=960#comment-1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite interesting.  Walton&#039;s  interpretation reminds me of some similar ideas in a book by Peter Leithart entitled _A House for My Name_.  In that book, Leithart surveys and frames the OT using the metaphor of God building himself a house.  Thus, in Genesis 1, God builds himself a three-story house, and Leithart posits that this three-storied house is alluded to in various ways throughout the Scriptures.  It&#039;s a good read that you might want to check it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite interesting.  Walton&#8217;s  interpretation reminds me of some similar ideas in a book by Peter Leithart entitled _A House for My Name_.  In that book, Leithart surveys and frames the OT using the metaphor of God building himself a house.  Thus, in Genesis 1, God builds himself a three-story house, and Leithart posits that this three-storied house is alluded to in various ways throughout the Scriptures.  It&#8217;s a good read that you might want to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timstafford</title>
		<link>http://timstafford.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/something-fresh-on-genesis/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timstafford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timstafford.wordpress.com/?p=960#comment-1761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Briefly, he reads Genesis 2-3 as the abandonment of the Temple by its priests (humanity) who refuse its calling. Thus &quot;the fall.&quot; The rest of the Bible is the story of God reestablishing his Temple rule.... where there is order and peace. Thus, the OT Temple is a kind of new Eden, and so are the people of God. And thus the rule is expanded into the Kingdom of God. The terminology changes, but I think you can trace it in a fairly straight line. 

Truthfully, I need to learn more about this before I spout it. But this is the rough outline I got. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briefly, he reads Genesis 2-3 as the abandonment of the Temple by its priests (humanity) who refuse its calling. Thus &#8220;the fall.&#8221; The rest of the Bible is the story of God reestablishing his Temple rule&#8230;. where there is order and peace. Thus, the OT Temple is a kind of new Eden, and so are the people of God. And thus the rule is expanded into the Kingdom of God. The terminology changes, but I think you can trace it in a fairly straight line. </p>
<p>Truthfully, I need to learn more about this before I spout it. But this is the rough outline I got. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reichert</title>
		<link>http://timstafford.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/something-fresh-on-genesis/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Reichert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timstafford.wordpress.com/?p=960#comment-1760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting, Tim.  Do you know how does Professor Walton reconciles his conclusion with the NT teaching that the church is God&#039;s temple?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, Tim.  Do you know how does Professor Walton reconciles his conclusion with the NT teaching that the church is God&#8217;s temple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
